Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current project page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.
Archives
Archives
 1 
The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Vilius20001

Fake/useless; Player probably does not exist, created by "user:Vilius2001" without other issues, and even in the article "His current name is unknown." It may even be that the player has been, more so for now it is only likely to be spam. The article has no relevant edits from other users, the only edits is by user:Vilius2001, and also the article is not relevant. MobbitTalk


Delete - There is no evidence the player exists. Smithing (talk | contribs) 17:50, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - There is some consensus to delete the page. Smithing (talk | contribs) 04:18, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Keep.

So Wreck3d

Not a well known player. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.29.120.247 (talk contribs)

Oppose - Articles aren't deleted simply because they're about a non-notable individual. Smithing (talk | contribs) 13:48, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Delete it. - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.62.181.81 (talk contribs)

Delete - without relevant content. Older versions with useless informations and probably false. Green partyhat.png Mobbit100Talk

Oppose - Now the article is acceptable and has sources. Green partyhat.png Mobbit100Talk 17:39, September 6, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose to deletion - All content of So Wreck3d's page is up to date, nothing is false. The way I see it, putting his page up for deletion is hate crime, just because of what he has done. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kyle Katarne (talk contribs)

Closed - There is no consensus to delete this article. One user thought the subject was not a well known player; however, as noted above, articles aren't deleted simply because they are about a non-notable player. Smithing (talk | contribs) 19:49, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

S 81

The page should be deleted because it is of an unknown player and no infomation should be spread or kept —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Runescape123 (talk contribs)

Closed - This page has been speedy deleted since the player requested the page be deleted. Smithing (talk | contribs) 19:41, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

East Berlin

The information given is clearly false and throughout the article the biased nature makes it a rather ridiculous article which should therfore be deleted.

Zebez20 (talk) 10:03, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

Delete - above.Green partyhat.png Mobbit100Talk 19:33, September 2, 2013 (UTC)

NO deletion - This article is made for players and by players and there is a reason we have a "article with unsourced claims" tag or something close to it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hjklo222 (talk contribs)

The problem isn't only that it's unsourced, but that it's clearly inaccurate. If you want, you can try creating this article at the RuneScape Fan Fiction Wiki. Smithing (talk | contribs) 17:12, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

Delete - The article only contains useless information. Talk- Viking Nico 23:56, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Don't delete this article why would anyone want it gone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.160.170.87 (talk contribs)

Delete - Nearly all of the article is blatantly inaccurate or filled with speculation. Smithing (talk | contribs) 17:12, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

Delete - Enough Said. This article is stupid and ruins the legitamentcy(mind the spelling) of the website. 10 years of ed (talk) 16:00, September 19, 2013 (UTC) 

Closed - Consensus is to delete the article. Smithing (talk | contribs) 06:24, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Russki_Pride

The person shown in the article is Zyzz, and i do not think he is the player.

"Aziz Sergeyevich (24 March 1989 – 5 August 2011) was a Moscow-born Australian bodybuilder"... See Wikipedia article Green partyhat.png Mobbit100Talk 23:20, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Delete The article is clearly not true as it states he won the "Sexiest and Toughest RuneScape Player" in 2012 even though he died in 2011. Talk- Viking Nico 00:08, September 9, 2013 (UTC)

Delete - As a suspected hoax, per above. Smithing (talk | contribs) 02:21, September 10, 2013 (UTC)

Closed - There is consensus to delete this article. The concern brought up was the content in this article was false. Smithing (talk | contribs) 19:51, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: No consensus.

Subzero

"A lot of the information on this page is speculation; and also as confirmed by Subzero, incorrect/distorted. Subzero has also expressed that he does not want his account history being posted on an infinite, public website."  — 77.98.215.135

Comment - Can I get confirmation from Subzero that this is true? Smithing (talk | contribs) 15:58, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

Closed - I'll tell you what. If you can confirm that Subzero wants this page deleted, just leave me a message on my talk page and I'll go ahead and delete it. Smithing (talk | contribs) 17:50, April 15, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Runescape illuminati

Filled with dubious content. For example, "this lead Brian to find a new form of hacking known as "Ddosing" and he then pioneerd the method thus known as the "ddos king" from then onwards". Smithing (talk | contribs) 13:36, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

Closed - Since no-one has left a comment opposing this deletion, I went ahead and deleted the page. Smithing (talk | contribs) 15:54, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

List of player moderators

This article should be removed due to the implications it has for moderation in and of itself. These players didn't ask to be listed and it's inappropriate to DOX (even if just a display name) a group of players. This list contributes to the difficulty of reporting adbots when they are now starting to utilize lists like this to keep from being muted. The only list of moderators that is acceptable are those that are of Forum moderators as any player can access those. Ryan PM 05:24, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comment - Just want to point out that this list could also be used to target and harass player moderators by other players with a dislike of PMods — Ciphrius Kane (talk) 07:16, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comment - This article should not exist and needs to be removed as soon as possible. First of all, this article doesn't have each invididual's permission to advertise them under this title. Secondly, as Ciphrius Kane said, this list could be used to target the players listed for harassment and other malicious activities. It has been 5 Months since this artcile was last requested for deletion. Please take it down ASAP. {{subst:delete-notify|List of player moderators}} KaceyTron (talk) 20:48, March 16, 2014 (UTC)

This article will not be removed until this discussion is over, however long that might take. I noticed that many users have continued to add names to the list despite the fact that it is undergoing a deletion discussion. One person even removed the tag from the article. Hence, I would like to see more input on the deletion of the article before making a decision. Smithing (talk | contribs) 21:51, March 16, 2014 (UTC)

Closed - Since it doesn't appear as though anyone who has been editing the page the past few months is interested in commenting here, I think it's time to close this discussion. The page will be deleted. Smithing (talk | contribs) 15:56, April 10, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Sal j

I want the page http://rsplayers.wikia.com/wiki/Sal_j deleted since it's NOT written by me or even provides accurate information.

Also, I request that the "Sal_j" be reserved for not being created, if that's possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by S a l (talk contribs)

Closed - I went ahead and speedily deleted the page. Smithing (talk | contribs) 22:18, March 8, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Mod MPH

No evidence has been provided that this mod even exists or is going to exist. This is a potential hoax. Smithing (talk | contribs) 23:34, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

Delete - Per above. - John Pot (talk) 09:56, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

Closed - There is consensus to delete this page. Smithing (talk | contribs) 03:47, July 26, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Wc Skill

Page has been turned into spam by some random without an account.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OppressionRS (talk contribs)

Closed - The page was speedily deleted. Smithing (talk | contribs) 02:43, May 13, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Nuke431

There is no indication that this article meets the notability criteria, and the majority of the article seems to be trivial. There was also nonsense and inaccurate information on the page added by the author, which has since been removed, which leads me to believe that this article was intended as a joke or a hoax. - John Pot (talk) 12:57, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Support. Do I support RFDs? Oh well. *Puts on shades* I JUST DID. --— Scuzzy Beta (talk) 13:14, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Closed - The article will be deleted. Smithing (talk | contribs) 18:05, August 27, 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Tyuijvhvh5

This article appears to have been created as a joke/story. It almost exclusively contains trivial information and does not meet the notability criteria. - John Pot (talk) 14:31, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Closed - Tyuijvhvh5 will be deleted because consensus was achieved by silence. - John Pot (talk) 00:44, February 19, 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the request for deletion below. Please do not modify it. The result was: Delete.

Jellefish

I can find no indication on the web that any of the claims in the article are true. A large portion of the article is also in breach of the NPOV policy. - John Pot (talk) 12:48, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Closed - The page will be deleted because consensus was achieved through silence. - John Pot (talk) 00:50, February 19, 2015 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.